Site Map
- Home
- About Us
- Practice Areas
- Resource Links
- What's New
- Newsletters
- What's New Archives
- 11/01/2011 - 02/03/2012
- 10/14/2011 - 01/27/2012
- 11/10/2011 - 09/20/2011
- 10/01/2011 - 10/31/2011
- 02/01/2010 - 11/19/2010
- 09/1/2009 - 01/25/2010
- 4/10/2009 - 8/18/2009
- 12/1/2008 - 03/24/2009
- 06/6/2008 - 11/18/2008
- 09/7/2007 - 05/30/2008
- 04/02/2007 - 08/29/2007
- 08/01/2006 - 03/29/2007
- 06/13/2006 - 07/27/2006
- 03/06/2006 - 05/25/2006
- 01/09/2006 - 02/28/2006
- 07/29/2005 - 12/29/2005
- 04/18/2005 - 06/28/2005
- 12/17/2004 - 03/23/2005
- 08/17/2004 - 11/17/2004
- 04/05/2004 - 07/16/2004
- 01/16/2004 - 03/10/2004
- 03/06/2003 - 12/23/2003
- 06/02/2002 - 08/17/2002
- 02/10/2002 - 04/18/2002
- 09/01/2011 - 09/30/2011
- Supreme Court review
- FAQs
- Cases
- Testimonials
- Articles
- Articles by Mark D. DeBofsky
- A crucial distinction exists in the types of plans
- Who decides whether treatment is appropriate?
- What happens when 'no good deed goes unpunished'?
- Ruling points out difficulties of assessing disability
- Courts struggle with when limitation periods accrue
- 5 factors give courts help in reviewing ERISA cases
- Claims within framework of federal civil procedure
- The challenges in calculating disability benefits
- Courts consider who can be sued as the defendant
- Contingency fee representation uncertain
- How do courts weigh conflicts of interest
- Court takes controversial position in Pettaway
- Determining when a cause of action accrues
- Ruling addresses policy limitations
- Does insurer get offset from VA disability benefits
- Return to work can create benefits controversy
- McCutchen may influence other court decisions
- Court looks at critical issues involving syndrome
- Approach clarifies benefit claim determinations
- Court reconsiders remanded benefit case
- Deferential review process needs fair standards
- 9th Circuit weighs statutory requirement failure
- Surprising ruling finds Unum's interpretation capricious
- Past Casenotes of the Month
- Garon v. Unum Life Ins.Co.
- Mead v. Reliastar Life Ins.Co
- Price v. Hartford Life & accid.Ins.Co.
- DuPerry v. Life Ins.Co. of North America
- Ball V Standard Ins.CO
- Functional Capacity Evaluation, Job versus Occupation, Pain, Selective Review of Evidence
- Grabowski v Lincoln
- Barrett v Sedgwick
- McDonnell v. First Unum
- Sconiers v. First Unum
- Kelly v Reliance
- Erisa 'full and fair' review of voluntary appeals
- Impact of Fee-Shifting Awards for Partial Success
- More Links
- More Quick Informational Links
- Quick Informational Links
- Informational Resource 1
- Informational Resource 2
- Informational Resource 3
- Informational Resource 4
- Informational Resource 5
- Casenote of the Month
- Articles by Mark D. DeBofsky
- Contact Us
- Maps & Directions
- Sitemap
